Challenger Pro League Stats 2026
BelgiumLeague2026Challenger Pro League BTTS Stats
How often both teams scored in each team's matches.
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Liège | 8 | 7 | 88% |
| 2 |  Patro Eisden | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 3 |  Seraing United | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 4 |  AS Eupen | 7 | 5 | 71% |
| 5 |  Club Brugge II | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 6 |  Lokeren-Temse | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 7 |  RSC Anderlecht II | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 8 |  Beerschot VA | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 9 |  KRC Genk II | 8 | 4 | 50% |
| 10 |  K. Lierse S.K. | 6 | 3 | 50% |
| 11 |  Excelsior Virton | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 12 |  KAA Gent II | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 13 |  Francs Borains | 6 | 2 | 33% |
| 14 |  Sporting Hasselt | 7 | 2 | 29% |
| 15 |  Dender | 7 | 1 | 14% |
Challenger Pro League Over 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 Goals
How often each team's matches had more goals than the selected line.
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liège | 8 | 7 | 88% |
| 2 | KRC Genk II | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 3 | Patro Eisden | 8 | 6 | 75% |
| 4 | AS Eupen | 7 | 5 | 71% |
| 5 | Club Brugge II | 7 | 5 | 71% |
| 6 | Francs Borains | 6 | 4 | 67% |
| 7 | K. Lierse S.K. | 6 | 4 | 67% |
| 8 | Beerschot VA | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 9 | Seraing United | 8 | 5 | 63% |
| 10 | Excelsior Virton | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 11 | KAA Gent II | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 12 | Lokeren-Temse | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 13 | RSC Anderlecht II | 7 | 4 | 57% |
| 14 | Sporting Hasselt | 7 | 3 | 43% |
| 15 | Dender | 7 | 2 | 29% |
Challenger Pro League Clean Sheets
Matches in which each team conceded no goals, and how often it failed to score.
| # | Team | MP | CS | CS % | FTS % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dender | 7 | 5 | 71% | 14% |
| 2 | Excelsior Virton | 7 | 3 | 43% | 14% |
| 3 | Beerschot VA | 8 | 3 | 38% | 13% |
| 4 | Francs Borains | 6 | 2 | 33% | 33% |
| 5 | K. Lierse S.K. | 6 | 2 | 33% | 33% |
| 6 | AS Eupen | 7 | 2 | 29% | 0% |
| 7 | Lokeren-Temse | 7 | 2 | 29% | 14% |
| 8 | Sporting Hasselt | 7 | 2 | 29% | 43% |
| 9 | KRC Genk II | 8 | 2 | 25% | 38% |
| 10 | Club Brugge II | 7 | 1 | 14% | 43% |
| 11 | KAA Gent II | 7 | 1 | 14% | 43% |
| 12 | Liège | 8 | 1 | 13% | 13% |
| 13 | Patro Eisden | 8 | 1 | 13% | 13% |
| 14 | Seraing United | 8 | 0 | 0% | 25% |
| 15 | RSC Anderlecht II | 7 | 0 | 0% | 43% |
Challenger Pro League Goals per Match
Goals scored, conceded and in total per match for each team.
| # | Team | MP | Scored | Conceded | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liège | 8 | 1.63 | 2.63 | 4.25 |
| 2 | Lokeren-Temse | 7 | 2.14 | 1.57 | 3.71 |
| 3 | Club Brugge II | 7 | 1.57 | 1.86 | 3.43 |
| 4 | RSC Anderlecht II | 7 | 1.00 | 2.43 | 3.43 |
| 5 | Beerschot VA | 8 | 2.50 | 0.88 | 3.38 |
| 6 | KRC Genk II | 8 | 1.50 | 1.88 | 3.38 |
| 7 | Seraing United | 8 | 1.38 | 2.00 | 3.38 |
| 8 | KAA Gent II | 7 | 1.29 | 1.86 | 3.14 |
| 9 | Patro Eisden | 8 | 1.38 | 1.75 | 3.13 |
| 10 | AS Eupen | 7 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| 11 | Excelsior Virton | 7 | 1.71 | 1.29 | 3.00 |
| 12 | Francs Borains | 6 | 1.50 | 1.17 | 2.67 |
| 13 | Sporting Hasselt | 7 | 1.14 | 1.43 | 2.57 |
| 14 | K. Lierse S.K. | 6 | 1.17 | 1.33 | 2.50 |
| 15 | Dender | 7 | 1.57 | 0.29 | 1.86 |
Challenger Pro League Corner Stats
Corners won, conceded and in total per match for each team.
| # | Team | MP | Won | Conceded | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Liège | 6 | 5.50 | 6.33 | 11.83 |
| 2 | K. Lierse S.K. | 3 | 4.00 | 7.33 | 11.33 |
| 3 | Francs Borains | 3 | 7.00 | 4.00 | 11.00 |
| 4 | RSC Anderlecht II | 5 | 6.00 | 4.60 | 10.60 |
| 5 | KRC Genk II | 5 | 5.00 | 5.20 | 10.20 |
| 6 | Beerschot VA | 6 | 5.67 | 4.33 | 10.00 |
| 7 | Lokeren-Temse | 4 | 6.00 | 3.50 | 9.50 |
| 8 | Seraing United | 5 | 3.80 | 5.60 | 9.40 |
| 9 | Dender | 5 | 5.20 | 3.80 | 9.00 |
| 10 | AS Eupen | 5 | 5.00 | 3.80 | 8.80 |
| 11 | Sporting Hasselt | 4 | 4.25 | 4.50 | 8.75 |
| 12 | KAA Gent II | 5 | 3.20 | 5.40 | 8.60 |
| 13 | Club Brugge II | 6 | 4.33 | 3.67 | 8.00 |
| 14 | Excelsior Virton | 4 | 3.25 | 4.50 | 7.75 |
| 15 | Patro Eisden | 6 | 2.83 | 4.33 | 7.17 |
Challenger Pro League Card Stats
Yellow and red cards each team received per match.
| # | Team | MP | Yellow | Red | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RSC Anderlecht II | 5 | 3.20 | 0.20 | 3.40 |
| 2 | KRC Genk II | 5 | 2.00 | 0.60 | 2.60 |
| 3 | Patro Eisden | 6 | 2.00 | 0.33 | 2.33 |
| 4 | Francs Borains | 3 | 2.33 | 0.00 | 2.33 |
| 5 | Excelsior Virton | 4 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.25 |
| 6 | Sporting Hasselt | 4 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.25 |
| 7 | AS Eupen | 5 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 2.20 |
| 8 | Beerschot VA | 6 | 2.00 | 0.17 | 2.17 |
| 9 | Club Brugge II | 6 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| 10 | Dender | 5 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| 11 | Seraing United | 5 | 1.60 | 0.20 | 1.80 |
| 12 | Lokeren-Temse | 4 | 1.75 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| 13 | Liège | 6 | 1.50 | 0.17 | 1.67 |
| 14 | KAA Gent II | 5 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| 15 | K. Lierse S.K. | 3 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
Corners and cards come from the official statistics of 36 matches.
Challenger Pro League Referees 2026
Referees who took charge of finished Challenger Pro League matches this season, with cards and fouls per match.
| Referee | MP |
|---|---|
| Klass Clerkx | 3 |
| Arne De Beuckelaer | 2 |
| Jasper Vitse | 2 |
| Lucas Loockx | 2 |
| Massimiliano Ledda | 2 |
| Ruben Calluy | 2 |
| Tim De Keyzer | 2 |
| Tom Stevens | 2 |
| Anaik Jacoby | 1 |
| Arthur Seynaeve | 1 |
| Dunken Van De Velde | 1 |
| L. Bultynck | 1 |
| Matonga Simonini | 1 |
League average: 4.30 cards and 29.0 fouls a match.
Challenger Pro League 2026 in numbers: teams compared
54 matches of the 2026 Challenger Pro League season have been played, at 3.15 goals a game. Both teams scored in 54% of them, and 63% had three or more goals.
Both teams score most often in Liège's matches: 88% of them. Liège's matches are the highest-scoring, with three or more goals in 88% of them. Dender play the tightest games, with three or more goals in only 29% of them. Dender have kept the most clean sheets, in 71% of their matches.
Matches with full statistics average 9.4 corners and 4.2 cards. Francs Borains win the most corners, 7.0 a match. RSC Anderlecht II receive the most cards, 3.4 a match.
Home teams have scored 1.80 goals a match and away teams 1.35. The standings are in the Challenger Pro League table, and match forecasts on the Challenger Pro League Predictions page. Figures are counted from finished matches only, using the score after 90 minutes, and update after every round.