AI Best Pick
Statistical forecasts for entertainment purposes only - not betting or financial advice.
Match Forecasts
Match Events
Lineups
1A. Gianniotis
2C. Winck
4A. Arous
27M. Ilie
45A. Karapo
16A. Baldursson
26K. Demirbay
50G. Yalçın
19M. Rafferty
7A. Kol
9A. Benedyczak
40A. Lafont
33A. Cissé
4D. Bates
5L. Dellova
7E. Krasniqi
22R. Raveloson
18G. Gül
17U. Meraş
91D. Sabia
45M. Diagne
10S. BalletKasımpaşa Substitutes
Amed Substitutes
Match Stats
Team Comparison
AI Insights
Game State Tendencies
- Comeback tendency: recovers from HT deficit 50% of the time
- Scores more in 2nd half (0.9 vs 0.7 in first half)
- Leads at half-time in 60% of matches
- Comeback tendency: recovers from HT deficit 100% of the time
- Scores more in 2nd half (1.7 vs 0.7 in first half)
- Concedes more in 2nd half - can tire late
Recent Form
Referee Profile
Compared with other referees
4.30 cards a match, 0.49 fewer than other referees in the same competitions and seasons (4.79).
Cards come from 88 matches with official statistics.
Full referee statsLeague Table
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | G | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 19:12 | +7 | 22 | WWWLW | |
| 2 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 20:10 | +10 | 20 | WWDWW | |
| 3 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 22:8 | +14 | 19 | WWWWL | |
| 4 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 18:10 | +8 | 18 | WLWLW | |
| 5 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 23:8 | +15 | 16 | LWWWD | |
| 6 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 13:9 | +4 | 16 | WWLDW | |
| 7 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 11:9 | +2 | 15 | WLLWL | |
| 8 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 8:12 | -4 | 14 | WWDWL | |
| 9 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 18:15 | +3 | 13 | LWWLW | |
| 10 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 19:16 | +3 | 12 | WWWDD | |
| 11 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9:11 | -2 | 12 | LLDWD | |
| 12 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 12:14 | -2 | 11 | LWDWL | |
| 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 11:15 | -4 | 10 | LLLDW | |
| 14 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6:9 | -3 | 8 | WLDDW | |
| 15 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9:15 | -6 | 8 | LLLLD | |
| 16 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7:18 | -11 | 8 | LLDLL | |
| 17 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 8:21 | -13 | 4 | LLLLL | |
| 18 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2:23 | -21 | 3 | LLLLL |
| # | Team | MP | G | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | 19:12 | 22 | |
| 2 | 9 | 20:10 | 20 | |
| 3 | 9 | 22:8 | 19 | |
| 4 | 9 | 18:10 | 18 | |
| 5 | 9 | 23:8 | 16 | |
| 6 | 9 | 13:9 | 16 | |
| 7 | 9 | 11:9 | 15 | |
| 8 | 9 | 8:12 | 14 | |
| 9 | 9 | 18:15 | 13 | |
| 10 | 9 | 19:16 | 12 | |
| 11 | 9 | 9:11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 9 | 12:14 | 11 | |
| 13 | 9 | 11:15 | 10 | |
| 14 | 9 | 6:9 | 8 | |
| 15 | 9 | 9:15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 9 | 7:18 | 8 | |
| 17 | 9 | 8:21 | 4 | |
| 18 | 9 | 2:23 | 3 |
Explore more predictions
This match
More Süper Lig matches
About the Kasımpaşa vs Amed forecast
Every forecast on this page comes from the same model inputs: team ratings, recent form, goals scored and conceded, and how these sides have fared against each other.
How to Read These Forecasts
Each percentage shows the model's calculated likelihood for that outcome. Above 65% indicates strong statistical confidence; 45-65% reflects a competitive, open match; below 45% suggests the outcome is statistically less likely. All figures are for informational and entertainment purposes only.
Kasımpaşa and Amed in the Süper Lig table
In the Süper Lig table, Amed are 2nd and Kasımpaşa 6th, 4 points apart. League goal record so far: Kasımpaşa 13-9, Amed 20-10. The full standings are on the Süper Lig Table 2026 page.
Key Factors for This Match
Amed have led at half-time in 60% of their recent matches. Kasımpaşa and Amed have little recent head-to-head history for the model to draw on. This forecast is based on a complete recent-form dataset for both teams.
All forecasts are generated by statistical and machine learning models for informational and entertainment purposes only. They are not guaranteed and do not constitute financial or betting advice.


